Re: [OT] SCO is going all out now
From: Brian McGroarty (brian_at_mcgroarty.net)
Date: 07/22/03
- Previous message: Louie Miranda: "how to have a gpg public key?"
- In reply to: Sharninder Singh-662: "Re: [OT] SCO is going all out now"
- Next in thread: Rich Johnson: "Re: [OT] SCO is going all out now"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 23:53:42 -0500 To: Sharninder Singh-662 <Sharninder.Singh-662@ushacomm.co.in>
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 10:06:26AM +0530, Sharninder Singh-662 wrote:
> >
> > If worst comes to worst and SCO finally show some incriminating code
> > in 2.4, stepping back to 2.2 until the relevant bits are purged from
> > 2.4 is all anyone should need to do to cover their assets in countries
> > where this becomes an issue.
>
> ya .. very true and debian makes it even better by coming with a 2.2
> installation in the stable distro. itself. is 2.6 also affected by this SCO
> claim ?
It can't be known if 2.6 will be affected until the specific claims
are made public.
SCO are still waving around a sealed envelope for anyone not willing
to sign a rather nasty contract. IANAL, but I suspect the courts will
force disclosure if Linux-related businesses approach the courts and
demonstrate that they are being adversely affected by this.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Louie Miranda: "how to have a gpg public key?"
- In reply to: Sharninder Singh-662: "Re: [OT] SCO is going all out now"
- Next in thread: Rich Johnson: "Re: [OT] SCO is going all out now"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
