Re: [OT] SCO is going all out now
From: Jody Grafals (jgrafals_at_techquest.cc)
Date: 07/23/03
- Previous message: Mark C: "Re: paper size"
- In reply to: Brian McGroarty: "Re: [OT] SCO is going all out now"
- Next in thread: Bret Comstock Waldow: "Re: [OT] SCO is going all out now"
- Reply: Bret Comstock Waldow: "Re: [OT] SCO is going all out now"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:20:48 -0400 To: debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
I make a living (a meager one) building Linux server with debian for
small businesses. I have never needed to build a multi CPU system so I
always remove the systematic multiprocessing stuff from the kernel when
I build, shouldn’t this be good enough ? Going back to 2.2 would be a
nightmare......... :-(
Any thougths ?
Brian McGroarty wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 08:26:49AM -0400, Rich Johnson wrote:
>
>
>>I guess I'll be going back to 2.2 until this nonsense blows
>>over....sigh.
>>
>>
>
>For a business, I'd just check to be sure that 2.2 will be okay for
>your needs. But I wouldn't step back to 2.2 until SCO actually makes
>the claims public.
>
>If you're an individual, I'd definitely wait. I'd expect a long period
>of SCO waving its paper swords and grandstanding before they get to
>showing the specific alleged violations.
>
>
>
>
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Mark C: "Re: paper size"
- In reply to: Brian McGroarty: "Re: [OT] SCO is going all out now"
- Next in thread: Bret Comstock Waldow: "Re: [OT] SCO is going all out now"
- Reply: Bret Comstock Waldow: "Re: [OT] SCO is going all out now"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]