apache-ssl or libapache-mod-ssl?
From: Alexander Meyer (ali_at_arles-electrique.de)
Date: 07/28/03
- Previous message: Michael D. Schleif: "Re: ~/.Xdefaults misbehaviour ?!?!"
- Next in thread: ScruLoose: "Re: apache-ssl or libapache-mod-ssl?"
- Reply: ScruLoose: "Re: apache-ssl or libapache-mod-ssl?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 17:12:13 +0200 To: Debian User Mailinglist <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
hi list,
i'm running a webserver for a client who wants to add an online payment
system to his webshop so i have to deploy a ssl-enabled webserver on the
same machine. the question is now if i would upgrade the already running
apache with mod-ssl or rather install an independent ssl-enabled apache.
i would feel slightliy better with the two-independent-packages approach
but i could be missing something. could anyone experienced with this
tell me about some pros and cons i might have forgot to consider?
thanks in advance.
alexander
-- Alexander Meyer Key ID: FA4FC80C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Michael D. Schleif: "Re: ~/.Xdefaults misbehaviour ?!?!"
- Next in thread: ScruLoose: "Re: apache-ssl or libapache-mod-ssl?"
- Reply: ScruLoose: "Re: apache-ssl or libapache-mod-ssl?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]