Re: 2.4.20 autofs: non-toplevel mounts broken?
From: Greg Folkert (greg_at_gregfolkert.net)
Date: 07/30/03
- Previous message: Greg Folkert: "RE: Arpwatch (was : mac addresses)"
- In reply to: Bob Proulx: "2.4.20 autofs: non-toplevel mounts broken?"
- Next in thread: Bob Proulx: "Re: 2.4.20 autofs: non-toplevel mounts broken?"
- Reply: Bob Proulx: "Re: 2.4.20 autofs: non-toplevel mounts broken?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: DebianUser list <debian-user@lists.debian.org> Date: 30 Jul 2003 01:28:31 -0400
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 01:18, Bob Proulx wrote:
<snip>
> Something really strange to my thinking is that the automount daemon
> from autofs did not change. Only the kernel was updated. The autofs
> side should not have changed. But since it is now not working I can
> only assume this is an interaction with the kernel which is causing
> this problem.
>
> Any clues?
Yep.
Oh... you want to know... OK :)
Modules not being loaded is typically the problem. That or the
rpc/portmap/...blah not compiled in.
So load them ... in /etc/modules
-- greg, greg@gregfolkert.net REMEMBER ED CURRY! http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry Wend you not to wreak annihilable havoc with my tumefascent transmitters and turgid devices. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Greg Folkert: "RE: Arpwatch (was : mac addresses)"
- In reply to: Bob Proulx: "2.4.20 autofs: non-toplevel mounts broken?"
- Next in thread: Bob Proulx: "Re: 2.4.20 autofs: non-toplevel mounts broken?"
- Reply: Bob Proulx: "Re: 2.4.20 autofs: non-toplevel mounts broken?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|