Re: Linux firewall vs Windows and Hardware based firewalls
From: Juri Haberland (juri_at_koschikode.com)
Date: 07/31/03
- Previous message: Mark C: "Re: Future Debian default MTA?"
- In reply to: Ron Johnson: "Re: Linux firewall vs Windows and Hardware based firewalls"
- Next in thread: DePriest, Jason R.: "RE: Linux firewall vs Windows and Hardware based firewalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:44:03 +0200 To: Debian-User <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 07:50, Robert Storey wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:11:14 +1000
>> Furthermore, Intel-based PCs have some well-known exploits
>> (such as buffer overflows) which are a function of the hardware and
>> there is no real cure because changing the CPU instructions would break
>> backward compatibility.
>
> Bzzz. Where did you hear that?
>
> Buffer-overflows are mainly a symptom of the "C" disease, and
> happen on ia32, Alpha, Sparc, etc. Any arch that has a C compiler.
Well, ever opened a Cisco PIX firewall? Guess what, it's running on an
Intel P233-MMX...
The remaining parts look like ordenary PC hardware, too.
So much for the hardware aspect...
Cheers,
Juri
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Mark C: "Re: Future Debian default MTA?"
- In reply to: Ron Johnson: "Re: Linux firewall vs Windows and Hardware based firewalls"
- Next in thread: DePriest, Jason R.: "RE: Linux firewall vs Windows and Hardware based firewalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]