Re: Helping the newbie

From: Andreas Janssen (andreas.janssen_at_bigfoot.com)
Date: 08/08/03

  • Next message: Siward: "Re:Woody and 1403TX router"
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 00:17:00 +0200
    
    

    Hello

    Jeremy Davis (<jeremy@slicenet.net>) wrote:

    > I am in the process of learning the the subtle differences in debian
    > compared to my main linux distro, which is Slackware. So I believe
    > that I am going to move to debian because of apt and all that it
    > implies :)
    > But I do have a question. Am I missing something in apt-get when
    > updating the packages. I noticed that perl 5.6 is kind of old as well
    > as the apache 1.3.26. Are the debian packages not kept up-to-date?
    > If not maybe I should move to something else? Sorry for my ignorance
    > on the subject, but I am willing to change this ignorance curve :)

    The stable distribution of Debian (3.0 aka Woody) was published last
    summer. The packages in the stable distribution are kept up to date as
    in "Security updates will be made available when needed", and other
    bugs are fixed when new revisions of Woody are published.

    Newer versions like Apache 2 will probably in the next release (Sarge),
    but not in Woody. And it is possible that it will take another year
    until Sarge becomes stable. If you want to use Debian, you have several
    choices:

    1. Use the stable version (Woody), be on the safe side when it comes to
    security updates, but use program versions that are older

    2. Use Woody with backports. There are inofficial updates for Woody
    available, like KDE 3, Gnome 2 and many more. Take a look at
    <http://www.apt-get.org>. However, these packages are not supported by
    the Debian security team.

    3. Use the testing version (Sarge) or unstable (Sid). Both have newer
    packages, Sid is quite up to date, but especially in Sid things can be
    broken for a while, and although from time to time security updates
    become available (like updates kernel source), it is basically
    unsupported by the Debian security team. Sarge or Sid are usable for
    desktop systems (at least many people use it, I use Woody with KDE 3),
    but I would not set up a public server with them.

    best regards
            Andreas Janssen

    -- 
    Andreas Janssen
    andreas.janssen@bigfoot.com
    PGP-Key-ID: 0xDC801674
    Registered Linux User #267976
    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: Siward: "Re:Woody and 1403TX router"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Newbie Nvidia/Woody problem
      ... I'd upgrade to Sarge or Sid; Woody is ... "stable" means that this version of Debian as a whole (not individual ... this package being removed; that package being added; another several ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Question about Nautilus in Gnome RH 7.3
      ... After 2 yrs Debian ... > is still selling this distro of Woody as the latest stable release, ... and Sid. ...
      (linux.redhat)
    • Re: Best free server distro with long life span?
      ... > I would recommend Debian for your purposes, even if it is not easy to ... woody and hopefully soon Sid for servers) ... Servers should be run on stable (currently woody) or perhaps testing ...
      (alt.os.linux)
    • woodys fate wrt security update
      ... I'm new to Debian, planning to install Sarge probably after Sarge ... (But I do have access to a Woody box, ... Speaking of Sarge becoming stable and starts getting security updates, ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: woodys fate wrt security update
      ... (But I do have access to a Woody box, ... > started familiarizing myself with Debian.) ... > Speaking of Sarge becoming stable and starts getting security updates, ... I think Potato got security updates for about six months after Woody ...
      (Debian-User)