firewire/usb2.0/ide enclosures.

From: Mike Dresser (mdresser_l_at_windsormachine.com)
Date: 08/11/03

  • Next message: Ismael Valladolid Torres: "Re: Backport issue"
    Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:26:11 -0400 (EDT)
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    
    

    I'm looking for a solution to backup a server that has about 40 gig a day
    of daily backups. Too big for a DDS-4 tape, and DLT/AIT/etc are just too
    expensive considering the alternatives available. The critical files are
    already backed up onto tape, I'm looking to expand what is backed up to
    the not as important stuff.

    Anyways, I'm looking at using a pair of 120 or 200 gig Maxtor DiamondMax
    Plus 9 or Maxline drives, and rotating the drives offsite, using a script
    to copy the days backup onto the drive. Replace drives when I drop them,
    of course. (not that that ever happens. *stares at a dead jaz drive and
    disks*)

    The server machine has both firewire and usb 2.0 ports, and has IDE ports
    available. ASUS P4B533-E.

    I was looking at the:

    http://www.vipower.com/product/SmartDisk/35_hdd_smartdisk/vp_9054v.htm

    combo unit(the 9054V), which has a common carrier, and a Firewire and
    also USB 2.0 cable.

    As well, I'd like another unit to use for moving large amounts of files
    around, and for restoring Windows images from the .tar.gz without having
    to power down a server to get at the files. Those backup servers have USB
    2.0 ports, but no firewire and obviously no IDE available.

    So I guess my question is, just how much slower is a USB 2.0 or Firewire
    interface going to be than the native IDE? I usually see around 35-40
    meg a second transfers with the bare drive on IDE, what could I expect
    from 2.0/Firewire? It would simplify things a bit if i didn't have to
    try and connect this directly to the IDE controller on the MB.

    If firewire wasn't much faster than USB 2.0, then I could get just the
    plain USB2.0 cable, saving a few dollars as well.

    Mike

    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: Ismael Valladolid Torres: "Re: Backport issue"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: NAS or USB Backup?
      ... Has anyone tried putting a second NIC in the server and putting the NAS on ... If I wasn't so cheap, I'd buy boxed drives instead of OEM, and I'd learn ... What you do to restore individual files is to "mount" the ... ShadowProtect backup - any full or incremental backup you choose. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: NAS or USB Backup?
      ... I have considered doing it with a member server. ... If I wasn't so cheap, I'd buy boxed drives instead of OEM, and I'd learn ... What you do to restore individual files is to "mount" the ... ShadowProtect backup - any full or incremental backup you choose. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: SBS 2008 Backup - restore utility?
      ... If you've already installed a fresh copy of SBS 2008 on another server, ... the Recovery Wizard in Windows Server Backup to recover files and folders ... On the Specify location type window, choose "Local drives" and clik ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: Several SBS services dead
      ... Backup running may or may not be related. ... three-week old Dell PE 830 server with CERC SATA controller and RAID1 ... Seagate drives (they are ST3160812AS drives, ... Browser, Logical Disk Manager, Shell Hardware Detection, and Automatic ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: Several SBS services dead
      ... Backup running may or may not be related. ... old Dell PE 830 server with CERC SATA controller and RAID1 Seagate drives ... Logical Disk Manager, Shell Hardware Detection, and Automatic Updates ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)