Re: dist-upgrade -vs- apache -vs- newbie

From: David Z Maze (dmaze_at_debian.org)
Date: 08/30/03

  • Next message: David Z Maze: "Re: libc6 in unstable"
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 17:33:19 -0400
    
    

    "Brendan & Jennifer Smith" <smithb1@gte.net> writes:

    > 1. (*) text/plain ( ) text/html

    (Please post to the list in plain text only.)

    > From what I've read, I believe I understand that once a "stable"
    > release is usurped by a new stable release (i.e. what will happen to
    > woody once sarge is ready), the security updates (for woody in this
    > example) discontinue.

    More or less, yeah. There's actually been some discussion of this in
    the past; people aren't necessarily anxious to jump forward to the
    next release if they have a stable production server that works well.
    Security releases have generally been continued for some amount of
    time after the next stable release, but not indefinitely.

    > So, if I want to run a small web server at home with Debian and Apache,
    > once Woody is outdated, will the dist-upgrade feature take me to Sarge
    > and preserve the Apache files and settings with maybe some tweaking of
    > the httpd.conf file, or would it be more complicated than that.

    The upgrade should definitely preserve your existing files and
    settings, yes. The upgraded package won't go out of its way to stomp
    on your existing httpd.conf. :-) (I believe the default setup does
    try to do things like automatically generate LoadModule lines, but
    that's about it.)

    > To parse it out; to maintain a secure web server with a distribution
    > that maintains its security would require dist-upgrade, right? And that
    > would bring forward all the settings. right?

    Probably, and yes.

    -- 
    David Maze         dmaze@debian.org      http://people.debian.org/~dmaze/
    "Theoretical politics is interesting.  Politicking should be illegal."
    	-- Abra Mitchell
    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: David Z Maze: "Re: libc6 in unstable"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Going from stable to testing
      ... Stable-type quick security updates are already occurring. ... so it's not quite as safe as the old Woody yet. ... and tweaking a Sarge to replace it at the ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Goodbye stable?
      ... > I think for the most part many running debian on the desktop are already ... > using sarge or sid, and I must say I am run several servers with woody, ... I enjoy the stability of woody also on the desktop but have to admit that the ... sarge versions of iptables and ssh stable enough to give me good security? ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Systemeinbruch, Passwort von root =?iso-8859-15?q?ge=E4ndert?= - ?? linux/RST.A Viru
      ... > Produktionsserver von Woody auf Sarge geupgradet. ... Next by Date: ...
      (de.comp.security.misc)
    • Need help with re-install on a old SCSI Debian box
      ... This afternoon there was an abrupt power outage. ... So I found another old SCSI drive and began an install. ... So I tried that and got a version of Woody ... I want to put Sarge on the machine. ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Debian and security/bugfixes/errata
      ... > new distro to replace it, and I'm mainly eyeing Debian and Fedora. ... a 2.4.18 kernel with security fixes since then backported. ... Most of my Woody boxes are running 2.4.22. ... A lot of the packages are based on quite old versions of the "upstream" ...
      (comp.os.linux.setup)