Re: Spamassassin + exim
From: Tom Allison (tallison_at_tacocat.net)
Date: 08/31/03
- Previous message: Tom Allison: "spamassassin"
- In reply to: Steve Lamb: "Re: Spamassassin + exim"
- Next in thread: Steve Lamb: "Re: Spamassassin + exim"
- Reply: Steve Lamb: "Re: Spamassassin + exim"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 23:40:13 -0400 To: Steve Lamb <grey@dmiyu.org>
Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 23:18:59 -0400
> Tom Allison <tallison@tacocat.net> wrote:
>
>> From what I'm seeing in the logs and in the docs is that Bayesian filtering
>>is enabled by default. But it is not used until there is (IIRC) 200 emails
>>of both spam and ham built into the database.
>
>
>
>>Did I miss something?
>
>
> How does it get to that 200 mark of ham and spam? While autolearning is
> turned on by default with a threshold of -2 for ham and +15 for spam this just
> reinforces the default SA rules.
It may be turned on in the config files, but I am guessing that the code is
skipping the bayesian score contribution until the mail count gets to 200 on
each side (ham/spam).
I just grabbed a lot of email I had already and fed it into the sa-learn.
I think I have enough now that it is working.
I'm not sure, I just kind of fiddled with it a few times in the early hours
and got it working.
-- Bombeck's Rule of Medicine: Never go to a doctor whose office plants have died. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Tom Allison: "spamassassin"
- In reply to: Steve Lamb: "Re: Spamassassin + exim"
- Next in thread: Steve Lamb: "Re: Spamassassin + exim"
- Reply: Steve Lamb: "Re: Spamassassin + exim"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|