Re: spamassassin
From: Tom Allison (tallison_at_tacocat.net)
Date: 08/31/03
- Previous message: Hershel Robinson: "Newbie Hardware/Partitioning"
- In reply to: Steve Lamb: "Re: spamassassin"
- Next in thread: Steve Lamb: "Re: spamassassin"
- Reply: Steve Lamb: "Re: spamassassin"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 06:40:12 -0400 To: Steve Lamb <grey@dmiyu.org>
Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 23:37:11 -0400
> Tom Allison <tallison@tacocat.net> wrote:
>
>>I don't know if you caught this or not, but spamassassin in -unstable has
>>been "fixed" to address the problem of osirusoft being offline.
>>
>>If you had configured your spamassassin with the '--local' option, you can
>>remove it after you upgrade.
>
>
> Never understood why people did --local in the first place. They could
> always just set the Osirus rules to 0 in either the global conf if they have
> access to it or their local conf if they do not. No need to throw out checks
> like DNS, Pyzor, Razor, MAPS and others just because of Osirus.
>
why?
braindead simple, validation process takes about 1 second.
really easy and simple to reinstate.
This is what I did and the difference was not significant in the amount of
spam that I received. It's nice to be able to fix three servers over a cup
of coffee before you go to your real job.
-- According to Kentucky state law, every person must take a bath at least once a year. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Hershel Robinson: "Newbie Hardware/Partitioning"
- In reply to: Steve Lamb: "Re: spamassassin"
- Next in thread: Steve Lamb: "Re: spamassassin"
- Reply: Steve Lamb: "Re: spamassassin"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]