Re: Logging into X remotely

From: Steve Lamb (grey_at_dmiyu.org)
Date: 08/31/03

  • Next message: Tom Allison: "CUPS"
    Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 04:47:26 -0700
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    
    
    

    On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 04:39:17 -0700
    Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca> wrote:
    > XDMCP would be easier and better on bandwidth (thus faster). VNC is
    > good when you need to display something graphical on a platform that
    > never anticipated multiuser, networked environments (namely, MS Windows).

        This is not entirely true. GTK2 apps dog very badly over X whereas with
    VNC the speed is acceptable. Prime examples are XChat and Pan. Both are
    related to scrolling.

        In Pan paging up or down in the article listing takes 1-2 seconds to
    redraw under X. W/VNC (well, TightVNC, Hextile, no compression) it is nearly
    instantaneous.

        XChat also lags badly when scrolling the channel view. Under X when there
    is quick chatter you'll get jerky 1/2-page scrolls. VNC (same as above) it is
    almost as smooth as having the client on the local machine.

        I've done both and settled on TightVNC (server and client) because of the
    above issues as well as the ability to access my desktop from multiple
    machines w/o shutting it down and restarting. Most of the time my laptop's
    got the display up but sometimes I want to just work on the main machine
    (larger screen, nicer input devices, access to sound, etc) and fire VNC up
    there in a shared session to take over. Of course I was (and still am) a
    heavy screen user so there might be a precedent set there years ago. :)

    -- 
             Steve C. Lamb         | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
           PGP Key: 8B6E99C5       | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
    -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
    
    

    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    


  • Next message: Tom Allison: "CUPS"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: VNC causes 90+% CPU load
      ... VNC the CPU usage stays at 90+% permanently! ... The FreeNX client, KNX is not as good as their own IMHO: ... I want to display the CURRENT desktop display back to ... the remote computer like I can with a VNC session. ...
      (alt.os.linux.suse)
    • Re: PsychTest
      ... I'm doing that with an IOGear USB KVM, two desktops, a laptop and a ... Again, look at VNC. ... you'll never go back to a single display! ...
      (sci.electronics.design)
    • Re: [SLE] VNC, Suse 9.3 & internal network
      ... VNC, ... administration via ssh. ... My server is named 'skyline'. ... kill the server and set the default display manager to kde or your preferred ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: Configuring GNOME to automatically start screensaver after user logged in - Fedora Core 6
      ... I have considered VNC and have successfully configured it. ... only deals with virutal displays and I require the real X display. ... I'm trying to configure Vino (GNOME Remote Desktop) on a computer I ...
      (linux.redhat)
    • Re: X Windows on remote client?
      ... X and VNC work in rather different ways. ... An X server serves display ... the X server runs on the machine that has ... remote machines use a VNC client to attach to ...
      (comp.os.linux.x)