Re: Amanda or taper
From: A. Loonstra (arnaud_at_[nospam)
Date: 09/09/03
- Previous message: Anthony Campbell: "Re: glx and xfree86 not working: why?"
- In reply to: Curtis Vaughan: "Amanda or taper"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 11:10:21 +0200 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> I have been using taper for backups for some time now, but just read an
> interesting article about Amanda. Is anyone using Amanda and is it
> better than taper?
>
> Thanks for your opinions,
>
> Curtis
>
>
I've used both taper and amanda... Wasn't taper the ncurses GUI thing
which would only do <4GB??? I've used amanda now for a while. Like it
very much. Easy to setup, easy to administrate. IMHO amanda can do way
more than taper can because of its client server model.
Arnaud.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Anthony Campbell: "Re: glx and xfree86 not working: why?"
- In reply to: Curtis Vaughan: "Amanda or taper"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
