Re: Trouble with DRI (WAS: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ATI drivers available)

From: Roberto Sanchez (rcsanchez97_at_yahoo.es)
Date: 09/10/03

  • Next message: Markus Dejmek: "Re: bf2.4 and the ptrace exploit"
    Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 02:40:42 +0200 (CEST)
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    
    

     --- csj <csj@zapo.net> escribió:
    > > I added this line to sources.list:
    > >
    > > deb http://penguinppc.org/~daniels/sid/i386/ ./
    >
    > I used to download my source from that site, when
    > Daniel-san. first took it upon himself to create XFree86 4.3 for
    > the terminally impatient. Now my 4.3 packages come from:
    >
    > http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86/
    >
    > I don't know how unofficial that is. But there are near nightly
    > builds of the debian diff's to the X sources. So somebody must
    > be maintaining them. To be sure, I take the trouble of compiling
    > from the source.
    >

    That is what I originally did. I downloaded the trunk sources and the
    patches up until the day I downloaded (22 July), and used dpkg-buildpackage
    to build all the .deb's.

    > > Which got me the same exact XFree86 that Knoppix uses (I had
    > > built my own packages from the sources and patches on the
    > > X-Strike Force page) back on July 22. I also downloaded the
    > > latest Radeon tarball from dri.sourceforge.net. Nothing I did
    > > got DRI working with the open source drivers. I also tried the
    > > xlibmesa4-drm-source package, but that did not help either.
    >
    > [...]
    >
    > Did you try "lsmod" on both machines? Did you make sure the
    > binary stuff was totally purged from your system? I ran into
    > some problem when I replaced my NVidia with the Radeon. The
    > binary drivers at that time wouldn't surrender without a fight
    > (something to do with "diversions" IRC).
    >

    Yes. I checked and restored all the files touched by the ATi package. I used
    'dpkg -L fglrx-glc22' to find all the files installed by the package and
    mancually checked them to be sure that they were the original versions
    installed
    by XFree86. I also checked all the symlinks to make sure that they pointed
    to the libs provided by XFree86.

    > Also I get my opensource radeon DRI drivers from a Debian
    > maintainer's unofficial "site":
    >
    > http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk/
    > http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/
    >
    > The first URL is for xfree86 4.2, the other for xfree86 4.3. I
    > had to eliminate the kernel options that would compile the
    > kernel's native radeon drivers (which would would be replaced by
    > dri-trunk's own kernel modules).
    >

    OK. I get them from the xlibmesa4-drm-src package and also tried the latest
    snapshots from the DRI homepage.

    > To be sure I'm running Daenzer's unofficial debs on top of the
    > official sid X 4.2. The debs allow me to play Chromium and
    > GLTron with decent explosions. Since the Radeon VE doesn't have
    > TCL (whatever that means) I get worse fps (100 fps) when running
    > glxgears under DRI than when running it under plain X (200 fps).
    > I think Chromium is a better test for 3D acceleration because it
    > allows you to waste your time in a more entertaining manner.
    >

    If I can ever get them working I will look at that as way to compare them.
    Until then, I would like to at least get the open source drivers working,
    so that I can compare.

    -Roberto

    ___________________________________________________
    Yahoo! Messenger - Nueva versión GRATIS
    Super Webcam, voz, caritas animadas, y más...
    http://messenger.yahoo.es

    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: Markus Dejmek: "Re: bf2.4 and the ptrace exploit"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: FC5 - T3 - Had enough. Package Managers, Yumex is crap.
      ... I finished update with a broken X server, blew my system away using apt-get and answering yes to the extreme package removal in order to add one package and a host of other mishaps. ... FC5 test cycle was the easiest to install and deal with me in relation to other Development cycles. ... Usually there are still packages cached in /var/cache/yum/development/packages after pirut exits. ... earlier which started the download in the first place. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: pkg_add -r openoffice Error: FTP Unable to get ftp:
      ... If there is a package link from the FreeBSD site, in the future, ... My only comments were to thank the poster who mentioned the package, ... got it from the "approved" site; and to suggest to the FreeBSD maintainers OOo ... gets you to a page where you select your language, OS, and download ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: New to FC
      ... When you download a application, where is the "right" folder to ... Your use of the term 'folder' suggests you are also new to *nix. ... these will be 'rpms' for use by your package manager. ... speaking, if you are installing tarballs, these can be _built_ anywhere ...
      (alt.os.linux.redhat)
    • Re: Evolution
      ... Evolution is greater than the use of Thunderbird? ... #is the number of people who installed this package; ... download Thunderbird at all, ...
      (Ubuntu)
    • Re: RH 9.0, Putting Samba on Linux with RPM?
      ... >> downloading the various manuals in the package forms. ... Take the time and follow the Download ... > Samba for the initial build. ... the time server, see 'man ntpd' without the quotes for the details. ...
      (linux.redhat.misc)