Re: Do we really need to worry about viruses

From: Alan Shutko (ats_at_acm.org)
Date: 10/02/03

  • Next message: Zakaria: "newbie needs help........."
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 15:41:35 -0500
    
    

    Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> writes:

    > How can an email virus work on *ix?

    How does it work on Windows? Either convince the user to click on a
    link, or exploit a bug in the MUA. When it has code running, scan
    the user's address book and mail archives, and send out lots of
    email. Include your own SMTP client to contact servers. None of
    this is restricted by root.

    It can also pop up a DDOS or SPAM server running as the user in a
    high-numbered port. If it wants root-level privileges (which none of
    the viruses out for Windows seem to need or care about) it can pop in
    a sniffer or some sort for the user's keystrokes to see if the user
    ever su's.

    > And a click-thru virus (or is it really a trojan?) can only do
    > damage to files that you have privs to touch (unless there's a bug
    > in Java or JavaScript).

    Sure. So? All the files I really care about are the ones I have
    privilege to touch. I don't care about the OS so much... I can
    install it again. I do care about the documents or code I'm working
    on. Or my local customizations. I have a 2GB home directory on my
    laptop at the moment. I care more about any of that data than
    anything the virus can't touch.

    Or, at work, I have access to modify all sorts of things that I need
    to in the context of my job. A virus could have a lot of fun.

    Sure, you can mitigate the risk. Backups, CVS repositories, secondary
    accounts for certain things, keeping things on several machines, can
    all reduce the damage a virus could do. But just saying "A virus
    can't hurt a user unless it's root" is incorrect. And downplaying
    that it can affect any file the user can touch ignores where most of
    the value is in the files on an average system.

    -- 
    Alan Shutko <ats@acm.org> - I am the rocks.
    Data in Oz: "If I only had a pulmonary apparatus . . ."
    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: Zakaria: "newbie needs help........."

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: adclicker-bb
      ... despite having upto date virus checkers and a firewall in place. ... given to the bug by the vendor of the software that found the bug. ... keep up to date at Windows Update and enable Automatic Updates ...
      (microsoft.public.security.virus)
    • Re: POSSIBLE HACK...PLEASE, PLEASE HELP!
      ... Its better to prevent it than remove it to this day PE virus are very potent and often destructive. ... "Annie" wrote in message ... >> with Windows XP Home then I certainly would allow a copy of Windows>> Live ... >> effectively Windows Live One Care can fix your problem. ...
      (microsoft.public.security)
    • Re: Attn: Sebastian Gottschalk - you have got a virus
      ... > All the posts you sent today had an attached file containing a virus. ... > Please clean it up. ... Would you care to show us this virus? ... 1st bug in MS win2k source code found after 20 minutes: ...
      (sci.crypt)
    • Re: actulice
      ... I have used Trend Micro's Virus Scan and Ad-aware 6.0 and ... Why would Windows XP allow something like this? ... consider this a bug because this operating system can not ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
    • Re: winkngu.exe attached to klez worm
      ... It is the virus itself, not any part of windows, so delete away without a ... care, and then delete from the deleted mail folder. ... > What is the significance of winkngu.exe to the Windows OS? ...
      (microsoft.public.security)