Re: Spamassassin+evolution
From: David Gaudine (david_at_emclab.concordia.ca)
Date: 10/28/03
- Previous message: Bob Proulx: "Re: automating e2fsck to assume y"
- In reply to: Monique Y. Herman: "Re: Spamassassin+evolution"
- Next in thread: Joan Tur: "Re: Spamassassin+evolution: size?"
- Reply: Joan Tur: "Re: Spamassassin+evolution: size?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 13:08:00 -0500 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Tuesday, October 28, 2003, at 12:39 PM, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> I searched on "size" in their FAQ and found nothing ... furthermore,
the
> INSTALL documentation shows an example procmail rule that contains no
> size limit.
>
> It may be the case that sa takes a while to process a large message,
but
>I doubt that it can't handle it.
That's it. It's somewhere in the documentation, along with a comment
that
really large messages usually aren't spam anyway so you wouldn't gain
much by letting SA look at them.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Bob Proulx: "Re: automating e2fsck to assume y"
- In reply to: Monique Y. Herman: "Re: Spamassassin+evolution"
- Next in thread: Joan Tur: "Re: Spamassassin+evolution: size?"
- Reply: Joan Tur: "Re: Spamassassin+evolution: size?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]