Re: What's the best package manager for single-package upgrades?

From: Colin Watson (cjwatson_at_debian.org)
Date: 11/07/03

  • Next message: ScruLoose: "Re: heres my noob install questions, smart people please help"
    Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 03:45:06 +0000
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    
    

    On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:19:47AM -0800, Joe Rhett wrote:
    > Colin Watson wrote:
    > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 04:41:50PM -0600, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
    > > > Try adding this line to your /etc/apt/apt.conf file and see if you get
    > > > better results with your 'apt-get update':
    > > > APT::Default-Release "testing";
    > >
    > > That's unnecessary if you only have one release listed in
    > > /etc/apt/sources.list (which is the configuration I'd strongly
    > > recommend) and may just introduce confusion in that case.
    >
    > Although I totally understand your logic, the idea I am hoping can work is
    > to run 'stable' by default, and upgrade to 'testing' versions of packages
    > only as necessary to fulfill a given need.

    While it's a nice idea, it won't actually work as you want, because
    packages in testing almost always depend on testing's libc6. Once you've
    upgraded to that, there's really very little point in trying to run
    stable for everything else, because you've already upgraded one of the
    parts of the system most likely to introduce instability.

    Also, other packages, particularly those related to interpreters like
    perl and python, frequently require the upgrade of surprisingly large
    swathes of your system.

    This is why I recommend against trying to mix stable and testing.

    Cheers,

    -- 
    Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: ScruLoose: "Re: heres my noob install questions, smart people please help"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: KDE 3.2 for SuSE
      ... >> These packages have NOT been tested at all and SuSE do NOT ... >> recommend to upgrade to these. ... >> security updates for your installation. ...
      (alt.os.linux.suse)
    • Updating problem with my woody.
      ... Last night I ran apt-get update and apt-get upgrade on a remote server ... apt-get install apache ... The following extra packages will be installed: ...
      (Debian-User)
    • RE: Some thoughts about Fedora Core 1 packages upgrade
      ... Some thoughts about Fedora Core 1 packages upgrade ... [duncan@smallberries rpms]$ cat checkit ... > Master server for all my hundreds of clients. ...
      (Fedora)
    • 2.6.15-1-686 Kernel Wont Upgrade
      ... Packages(media player upgrade in order to play vider). ... installing new version: Operation not permitted". ... The following packages have been kept back: ... localepurge: checking system for new locale ... ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Unable to upgrade NSLU2 running debian
      ... All of the perl errors are gone, but the dpkg upgrade still fails. ... Reading package lists... ... The following packages have been kept back: ... To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ...
      (Debian-User)