Re: "Red Hat recommends Windows for consumers"

From: user list (debian-user_at_icantbelieveimdoingthis.com)
Date: 11/08/03

  • Next message: BruceG: "Off to the Docs. I go (Exim4 working, fetchmail busted)"
    Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 16:44:06 -0700
    To: Daniel Miller <dmiller@amfes.com>
    
    

    Speaking of Reader Rabbit, has anyone gotten any of the educational
    games running under wine?

    Art Edwards

    On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 02:52:38PM -0800, Daniel Miller wrote:
    > Ron Johnson wrote:
    >
    > >On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 13:20, techlists wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > >>On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 17:52, David Millet wrote:
    > >>
    > >>
    > >>>>>all I have to say is that I personally want linux to rule the desktop,
    > >>>>>simply because I will stand to make alot of money when big companies
    > >>>>>start picking it up. a lot of us will, in fact.
    > >>>>>
    > >>>>>i'm extremely confident that it will rule the desktop market, because
    > >>>>>of the speed at which the desktops have improved, which i have been
    > >>>>>lucky to observe during the past year i've been doing the linux thing.
    > >>>>>i've seen major improvements, unlike how windows upgrades their
    > >>>>>operating systems these days. i use winXP at work and haven't seen
    > >>>>>yet too much of an improvement from win2000. i agree with that guy
    > >>>>>from red hat. give kde, gnome, etc a few more years to mature and it
    > >>>>>will be night-night time for the M$ monopoly.
    > >>>>>
    > >>>>>
    > >>>>>
    > >>>>Not until Broderbund releases a Calendar Creator that works with
    > >>>>Linux. Ditto for Reader Rabbit, Math Blaster, etc, etc, ad nauseum.
    > >>>>
    > >>>>
    > >>>>
    > >>>Or not until wine begins running these and every windoze app that
    > >>>everyone uses flawlessly, which hopefully happens soon.
    > >>>
    > >>>david
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>As much as I like Wine, and use it myself for some products, I fear that
    > >>the wine project may do to linux what win-os/2 did for os/2. If your
    > >>system will run win32 apps, what insentive do companies have to develop
    > >>native programs for you.
    > >>
    > >>
    > >
    > >One difference is that Big Blue bungled the marketing of OS/2 worse
    > >than DEC did of VMS, and that's saying something.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > I must admit I was a bit disappointed in the outcome of OS/2. Not to
    > get off topic, but credit is due.
    >
    > My first experience with OS/2 was version 2.0 - attempting to run in on
    > a 386 with 4M RAM. It didn't run, it didn't even stagger - it crawled.
    > But it did install, and it did function. This being in the '80's, I
    > returned my 40+ disks to their package and got a refund from the store
    > (it wasn't Egghead, I forgot the name).
    >
    > Then I tried version 2.1 - this time with 8M RAM. There was something a
    > bit unusual here - the distribution had about half the disks, required
    > less hard drive space - and ran faster with more features.
    >
    > This I had Warp version 3.0 - again, smaller distribution, smaller
    > installation requirements, more features. This was my platform of
    > choice for running Windoze 3.x applications.
    >
    > I don't think I've ever seen a better example of programmers taking more
    > pride in their work and continually refining their code - instead of
    > just throwing more hardware at a performance problem. I've seen
    > exceptional programs written from scratch - Q, later TSE comes to mind -
    > but the level of improvement displayed by OS/2 I haven't seen anywhere
    > else. If IBM had decided to tackle a Win95 emulator - I think the
    > market would be bit different today.
    >
    > Sigh. I guess they already knew whatever undocumented functions they
    > emulated - Microsoft's next version would just add more.
    >
    > Oh well. Maybe I need to start scrounging pennies and forwarding my
    > meager contributions to the Wine effort - being able to eliminate
    > Windoze while retaining my existing application library is quite appealing.
    >
    > Daniel
    >
    >
    > --
    > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
    > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
    > listmaster@lists.debian.org
    >

    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: BruceG: "Off to the Docs. I go (Exim4 working, fetchmail busted)"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: "Red Hat recommends Windows for consumers"
      ... I must admit I was a bit disappointed in the outcome of OS/2. ... choice for running Windoze 3.x applications. ... If IBM had decided to tackle a Win95 emulator - I think the ... meager contributions to the Wine effort - being able to eliminate ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Agent 5.0 beta
      ... planed 5.0 features. ... It's a shame they don't have a linux port, ... wine), but I've found PAN to be pretty effective for my uses. ...
      (misc.news.internet.discuss)
    • Re: WINE is a Joke.
      ... > WINE is nothing more than a pile of junk that let's Linux users ... > scratch the surface of quality Windows applications. ... > Pick and application that supposedly runs with WINE and you will be ... > greeted with an entire laundry list of features that won't work. ...
      (alt.os.linux.suse)
    • Re: WINE is a Joke.
      ... > WINE is nothing more than a pile of junk that let's Linux users ... > scratch the surface of quality Windows applications. ... > Pick and application that supposedly runs with WINE and you will be ... > greeted with an entire laundry list of features that won't work. ...
      (alt.os.linux.redhat)
    • Re: WINE is a Joke.
      ... > WINE is nothing more than a pile of junk that let's Linux users ... > scratch the surface of quality Windows applications. ... > Pick and application that supposedly runs with WINE and you will be ... > greeted with an entire laundry list of features that won't work. ...
      (alt.os.linux.suse)