Re: Debian woody or sarge?
From: Frank Gevaerts (frank_at_gevaerts.be)
Date: 11/17/03
- Previous message: Wendell Cochran: "Subject: Re: Opium [was: Re: freelance sysadmining -- superlong -- [WAS: "Red Hat recommends"
- In reply to: Bob Proulx: "Re: Debian woody or sarge?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:15:38 +0100 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 11:11:03AM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Stable is not up to handling gforge at the moment.
There are packages for stable available though. They seem to work well.
Frank
-- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Wendell Cochran: "Subject: Re: Opium [was: Re: freelance sysadmining -- superlong -- [WAS: "Red Hat recommends"
- In reply to: Bob Proulx: "Re: Debian woody or sarge?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|