Re: Experiment: Neophyte versus Windows XP & Debian Woody
From: Tom (tb.31123.nospam_at_comcast.net)
Date: 11/26/03
- Previous message: Jonathan Wheelhouse: "gconf2 - sid gnome won't start"
- In reply to: Paul Morgan: "Re: Experiment: Neophyte versus Windows XP & Debian Woody"
- Next in thread: Paul Morgan: "Re: Experiment: Neophyte versus Windows XP & Debian Woody"
- Reply: Paul Morgan: "Re: Experiment: Neophyte versus Windows XP & Debian Woody"
- Reply: Erik Steffl: "Re: Experiment: Neophyte versus Windows XP & Debian Woody"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 17:12:59 -0800 To: Debian-User List <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 06:33:57PM -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
> In my experience, /opt and /usr/local have slightly different functions.
> /opt would be used for vendor applications, etc., whereas /usr/local
> would be used for locally built tools, etc.
Adobe Acrobat and VMWare both install to /usr/local.
Should they be in /opt or are there further considerations...
What does /opt stand for? "Optional"? "Options?"
What does /var stand for?
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Jonathan Wheelhouse: "gconf2 - sid gnome won't start"
- In reply to: Paul Morgan: "Re: Experiment: Neophyte versus Windows XP & Debian Woody"
- Next in thread: Paul Morgan: "Re: Experiment: Neophyte versus Windows XP & Debian Woody"
- Reply: Paul Morgan: "Re: Experiment: Neophyte versus Windows XP & Debian Woody"
- Reply: Erik Steffl: "Re: Experiment: Neophyte versus Windows XP & Debian Woody"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|