Re: Experiment: Neophyte versus Windows XP & Debian Woody
From: Erik Steffl (steffl_at_bigfoot.com)
Date: 11/26/03
- Previous message: Monique Y. Herman: "Re: Experiment: Neophyte versus Windows XP & Debian Woody"
- In reply to: Tom: "Re: Experiment: Neophyte versus Windows XP & Debian Woody"
- Next in thread: Monique Y. Herman: "Re: Experiment: Neophyte versus Windows XP & Debian Woody"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Debian-User List <debian-user@lists.debian.org> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 22:29:27 -0800
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 17:12, Tom wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 06:33:57PM -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
> > In my experience, /opt and /usr/local have slightly different functions.
> > /opt would be used for vendor applications, etc., whereas /usr/local
> > would be used for locally built tools, etc.
>
> Adobe Acrobat and VMWare both install to /usr/local.
> Should they be in /opt or are there further considerations...
>
>
> What does /opt stand for? "Optional"? "Options?"
according to fhs it's definitely /opt
> What does /var stand for?
I guess variable (fhs says: /var contains variable data files)
see http://www.pathname.com/fhs/2.2/
erik
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Monique Y. Herman: "Re: Experiment: Neophyte versus Windows XP & Debian Woody"
- In reply to: Tom: "Re: Experiment: Neophyte versus Windows XP & Debian Woody"
- Next in thread: Monique Y. Herman: "Re: Experiment: Neophyte versus Windows XP & Debian Woody"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|