Re: (no subject)
From: Ken Gilmour (ken_at_playersonly.com)
Date: 12/24/03
- Previous message: Grzesiek Sedek: "Re: module-less kernel error messages"
- In reply to: Hugo Vanwoerkom: "Re: (no subject)"
- Next in thread: Hugo Vanwoerkom: "Re: (no subject)"
- Reply: Hugo Vanwoerkom: "Re: (no subject)"
- Reply: Paul Morgan: "Re: (no subject)"
- Reply: Paul Johnson: "Re: (no subject)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: <hvw59601@care2.com>, <debian-user@lists.debian.org> Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 17:40:58 GMT
>
> This is an automated reply from the Debian List Automated Monitor
(DLAM):
> Your monitored IQ is measured to be:
> 0.8 brick
> Not sufficient to post. Sorry. Try taking IQ courses.
>
> I didn't know they installed that AI tool of mine! ;-)
>
> Hugo.
Shouldn't @aol.com addresses just be banned altogether? They seem to
always have windows problems when writing to this list.
All AOL Users (that i know of) are PEBKAC (Problem Exists Between
Keyboard And Chair) people
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Grzesiek Sedek: "Re: module-less kernel error messages"
- In reply to: Hugo Vanwoerkom: "Re: (no subject)"
- Next in thread: Hugo Vanwoerkom: "Re: (no subject)"
- Reply: Hugo Vanwoerkom: "Re: (no subject)"
- Reply: Paul Morgan: "Re: (no subject)"
- Reply: Paul Johnson: "Re: (no subject)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]