Re: slow booting after installing new hdd

From: Akira Kitada (aktdjp_at_ybb.ne.jp)
Date: 12/30/03

  • Next message: B. L. Jilek: "Re: OT: SCSI better than IDE?" 
    Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 02:53:51 +0900
To: Hugo Vanwoerkom <hvw59601@care2.com>

    On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 10:08:12AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
    > Akira Kitada wrote:
    > >Hi all.
    > >
    > > a few days ago, I had 82.3GB disk installed on my box
    > >as primary slave.
    > >after that, I turned it on and reading messages of kernel,
    > >and found messages that means 'hdb' recognized smoothly.
    > >that's good.
    > >badly, I found some error messages too,
    > >and noticed booting is very slower than before.
    > >the messages is below.
    >
    > You did not specify what kernel but I had to include a kernel
    > module to get proper DMA working.

    I'm using Linux 2.4.22 as I wrote the first mail ;-)
    well, you seem to suspect that
    it's a problem of lack of proper module, don't you?
    if so, why doesn't it happen till I put hdd on?
    I can't stop wondering why?

    > Check ATA/IDE/MFM/RLL support -> IDE,ATA and ATAPI Block Devices ->
    >
    > In my case I checked VIA82CXXX. Check out which module pertains to
    > your disk. I am using 2.4.23

    mine is below. VIA82CXXX is out, seem to be involving as you say.

    # egrep 'VIA' config-2.4.22
    # CONFIG_MVIAC3_2 is not set
    # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX is not set
    # CONFIG_VIA_RHINE is not set
    # CONFIG_VIA_RHINE_MMIO is not set
    CONFIG_AGP_VIA=y
    # CONFIG_SOUND_VIA82CXXX is not set
    # CONFIG_MIDI_VIA82CXXX is not set

    >
    > Congratulations with the new HDD ;-)

    Thanks!
    I use it little because of this trouble, though ;( 

    -- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
  • Next message: B. L. Jilek: "Re: OT: SCSI better than IDE?"