Re: Using RAID chipsets in the motherboard.

From: Ramasubramanian Ramesh (rramesh_at_ti.com)
Date: 12/30/03

  • Next message: Stephen: "Re: Good front end for small postgress dtabases?" 
    Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:46:01 -0600
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>, debian-user@lists.debian.org

    Henrique,

       Thanks for your reply. I suppose there is no point in buying a mobo with these extra chipsets as
    most of them seem to be not supported at this point.

       A simple followup. This is what I understand from your answers. Please correct me if I am wrong.

    1) SATA is usable as host. Therefore Linux will see the disks attached to this controller just
    like other IDE disks - but perhaps as scd0 and scd1. For
       this I need a driver for ICH5R (intel) driver for this SATA host adapter.
       Is this included in stock kernel source (I mean source 2.4.18 or 2.6.xx)

    2) Other IDE RAID controllers are not even usable as host adapters as they
       need drivers for those chipsets and at this point the drivers do not exist.
       My target controller is the VIA chipsets included in ASUS P4P800 Delux mobo.
       (Mobo says VIA6410 Raid gives access to 2x ultradma 133 in raid 0, 1, 0+1 or
       JBOD)

    Thanks and Regards
    Ramesh

    Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
    >
    > On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Ramasubramanian Ramesh wrote:
    > > 1) All most all of the newer motherboards come with SATA RAID. Is this usable
    > > as is without any additional kernel drivers. I ask this because I read in
    > > many knowledge base resources that a HW controller looks just like an IDE
    > > controller.
    >
    > It is usable as a SATA host (controller). The RAID function is not usable
    > yet, and since it is crap (software-assisted winraid), you are better off
    > using linux native software RAID anyway.
    >
    > > 2) What about additional on board RAID controllers? Like the VIA/PROMISE
    > > Chipsets built into some of the ASUS mother boards? Do they require
    > > additional drivers or can I use them just like any other IDE controller?
    >
    > In _any_ case, you need the kernel to have the drivers for the chipsets
    > compiled in (or appropriate modules loaded). The SATA disks will show up as
    > scsi disks, I believe.
    >
    > Not many chipsets are supported, but hopefuly the Promise ones are... you
    > _will_ need a very recent kernel (2.4.23, 2.4.24-pre or 2.6.0) and maybe the
    > libata patch. Search google for more details...
    >
    > --
    > "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
    > them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
    > where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
    > Henrique Holschuh 

    -- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
  • Next message: Stephen: "Re: Good front end for small postgress dtabases?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Problem installing SBS2003 on MSI 915P motherboard with SATA R
      ... The RAID controller reckons one of the disks is ... Controller" Not sure what that is, but the RAID drivers, Sound, and LAN are ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: No IDE drivers loaded for Toshiba Satellite 320 CDS
      ... Well even if you see other disks doesn't mean you don't also have an old ... /sys/bus/isa is present for this machine so it works even if the controller is not actually on the ISA bus. ... The legacy one is SFF compliant and depending on configuration may appear at legacy IO addresses, so if you aren't careful, you can end up with two drivers driving the same hardware which usually doesn't end too well. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Looking for a good entry level server board that plays well with FC3.
      ... If onboard those chipsets are always just BIOS supported ... Watching out for onboard LAN keep care to get a Linux kernel supported ... device, where you don't have to rely on external, vendor only drivers. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Rolling back Computer device in device manager (hal.dll) after installing SP2 gives BSOD after r
      ... Chipsets, in similar models. ... rev *and* BIOS level, or just a chipset that happens to be from the same vendor and it's 'close enough' because it's of the same generation and has the same feature set, approximately? ... The fact that you're not changing vendor does not make it safe. ... MS has to draw the line somewhere and assume at least a modicum of intelligence on the part of someone messing around with drivers. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment)
    • Re: flash replacing hard disks?
      ... >Actually the newer nForce3 and nForce4 chipsets, ... do not require any special drivers to install ... >Windows to get access to the performance features of the SATA drive. ...
      (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips)