Re: "best practices" on debian
From: Akira Kitada (aktdjp_at_ybb.ne.jp)
Date: 12/31/03
- Previous message: Mario Vukelic: "Re: was wondering"
- In reply to: Colin Watson: "Re: "best practices" on debian"
- Next in thread: Colin Watson: "Re: "best practices" on debian"
- Reply: Colin Watson: "Re: "best practices" on debian"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 21:46:36 +0900 To: debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:51:10AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I found apt-get.org, and see that there are lots of debian packages
> > available from various sources there. But some things, for example
> > mozilla, are available right from the mozilla site as binaries that have
> > always "just worked" in my experience. Is it bad to install mozilla that
> > way, completely bypassing the apt system?
>
> I agree with those who've mentioned /usr/local. Trying to mix testing
> and unstable is likely to be confusing, particularly if you're new to
> Debian.
like what curse happen?
Show me some cases if you don't mind.
though I've been using mixture of testing and unstable,
I've never met any disastar... yet.
Thanks.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Mario Vukelic: "Re: was wondering"
- In reply to: Colin Watson: "Re: "best practices" on debian"
- Next in thread: Colin Watson: "Re: "best practices" on debian"
- Reply: Colin Watson: "Re: "best practices" on debian"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]