Re: Good front end for small postgress dtabases?

From: Colin Watson (cjwatson_at_debian.org)
Date: 12/31/03

  • Next message: Colin Watson: "Re: "best practices" on debian" 
    Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:06:40 +0000
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org

    On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 08:47:53AM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote:
    > Nano Nano(40101.nospam@comcast.net) is reported to have said:
    > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 08:57:51PM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote:
    > > > I wondered about. I am running testing and have automake 1.4-p6-2,
    > > > which is the latest version for testing/unstable, or so apt-get tells
    > > > me. The ./proj fails because its looking for aclocal-1.7. The latest
    > > > automake has aclocal-1.4.
    > > >
    > > > I won't go out to find an automake thats not a debian packgage, but
    > > > thats me.
    > >
    > > I'm running SID. I expect you can edit the AMVER and ACVER in proj
    > > and/or proj.c to the version numbers you have and it will work. (proj
    > > is generated by running "gcc proj.c; ./a.out".)
    >
    > 'apt-get -s -t unstable install automake' says I have the latest version
    > and I just did an update yesterday. So SID != unstable?? Thats what
    > confused me.

    sid is unstable. Try the automake1.7 package; they have different names
    so that you can install multiple versions in parallel.

    Cheers, 

    -- 
Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
  • Next message: Colin Watson: "Re: "best practices" on debian"