Re: /dev/cdrom is not a valid block device`
From: Steven Yap (syap_at_shaw.ca)
Date: 01/02/04
- Previous message: Pascal Hakim: "Re: References headers missing in debian-user-digest"
- In reply to: Jan Minar: "Re: /dev/cdrom is not a valid block device`"
- Next in thread: Jan Minar: "Re: /dev/cdrom is not a valid block device`"
- Reply: Jan Minar: "Re: /dev/cdrom is not a valid block device`"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2004 20:04:47 -0800 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 19:28, Jan Minar wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 07:32:45PM -0800, Steven Yap wrote:
> > /dev/cdrom is a symbolic link to hdc. Is your CDROM drive really on hdc?
> > Try using the full path (/dev/hdc).
>
> There's no difference between an absolute and a relative path here. The
> symlinks are relative to the directly they reside in.
Oh, good to know. Stylistically, I'm rather fond of absolute paths in a
symlink. Not sure why though.... hrmmm.
My New Years resolution: More involvement with debian-user. :)
-- Steven Yap <syap@shaw.ca> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Pascal Hakim: "Re: References headers missing in debian-user-digest"
- In reply to: Jan Minar: "Re: /dev/cdrom is not a valid block device`"
- Next in thread: Jan Minar: "Re: /dev/cdrom is not a valid block device`"
- Reply: Jan Minar: "Re: /dev/cdrom is not a valid block device`"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|