Re: /dev/cdrom is not a valid block device`
From: Jan Minar (Jan.Minar_at_seznam.cz)
Date: 01/02/04
- Previous message: Kevin Mark: "Re: xfree 4.3 in sid anytime soon?"
- In reply to: Steven Yap: "Re: /dev/cdrom is not a valid block device`"
- Next in thread: Robert Storey: "Re: /dev/cdrom is not a valid block device`"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 06:07:31 +0100 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 08:04:47PM -0800, Steven Yap wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 19:28, Jan Minar wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 07:32:45PM -0800, Steven Yap wrote:
> > > /dev/cdrom is a symbolic link to hdc. Is your CDROM drive really on hdc?
> > > Try using the full path (/dev/hdc).
> >
> > There's no difference between an absolute and a relative path here. The
> > symlinks are relative to the directly they reside in.
>
> Oh, good to know. Stylistically, I'm rather fond of absolute paths in a
> symlink. Not sure why though.... hrmmm.
The difference shows up when you mount the filesystem elsewhere (rescue),
rearrange your directory structure, when you share a filesystem, etc.
-- Jan Minar "Please don't CC me, I'm subscribed." x 4
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Kevin Mark: "Re: xfree 4.3 in sid anytime soon?"
- In reply to: Steven Yap: "Re: /dev/cdrom is not a valid block device`"
- Next in thread: Robert Storey: "Re: /dev/cdrom is not a valid block device`"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|