Re: .deb dependancy hell
From: David Z Maze (dmaze_at_debian.org)
Date: 01/28/04
- Previous message: David Clymer: "Re: Debian list = spam and virus repeater/multiplexer"
- In reply to: Richard Hoskins: ".deb dependancy hell"
- Next in thread: Rosenstrauch, David: "RE: .deb dependancy hell"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:01:08 -0500
Richard Hoskins <rhos@adelphia.net> writes:
> rich@lajoie:~$ sudo dpkg -r libgphoto2-2
> dpkg: dependency problems prevent removal of libgphoto2-2:
> libgphoto2-port0 depends on libgphoto2-2.
> rich@lajoie:~$ sudo dpkg -r libgphoto2-port0
> dpkg: dependency problems prevent removal of libgphoto2-port0:
> libgphoto2-2 depends on libgphoto2-port0 (>= 2.1.4-1).
Much as when installing mutually dependent packages using dpkg
directly, give both package names on the command line:
dpkg --remove libgphoto2-2 libgphoto2-port0
> Kind of reminds me of RPM:
dpkg-the-program is in fact very similar to rpm-the-program. Trying
to manage a Debian system using only an FTP client and dpkg is
shockingly like trying to maintain an RPM-based system. :-) Debian
has a consistent policy for packages so they interoperate better, and
higher-level tools like dselect and APT, which, combined with a
unified package repository, make the system much more usable.
-- David Maze dmaze@debian.org http://people.debian.org/~dmaze/ "Theoretical politics is interesting. Politicking should be illegal." -- Abra Mitchell -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: David Clymer: "Re: Debian list = spam and virus repeater/multiplexer"
- In reply to: Richard Hoskins: ".deb dependancy hell"
- Next in thread: Rosenstrauch, David: "RE: .deb dependancy hell"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|