Re: .deb dependancy hell
From: Richard Hoskins (rhos_at_adelphia.net)
Date: 01/29/04
- Previous message: Sam Ruby: "libmemoize-perl/testing: Broken package?"
- In reply to: Rosenstrauch, David: "RE: .deb dependancy hell"
- Next in thread: Stephen Rueger: "Re: .deb dependancy hell"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 19:34:42 -0500
"Rosenstrauch, David" <david.rosenstrauch@csfb.com> writes:
> In any case, you probably should take this issue with a grain of
> salt anyway. You are running "unstable", after all. :-)
Absolutely. I'm still learning package management on Debian. The
only box I'm running it on is my personal (as in home) machine. So
this whole thing is one big grain of salt, and I expect to screw up,
find things I like about Debian, find things I don't like, and bump
into more odd things that I'll question.
Once again, thanks for your help, and thanks to everybody who replied
with help.
--
Lift me down, so I can make the Earth tremble.
--Bucky Katt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Sam Ruby: "libmemoize-perl/testing: Broken package?"
- In reply to: Rosenstrauch, David: "RE: .deb dependancy hell"
- Next in thread: Stephen Rueger: "Re: .deb dependancy hell"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
