Re: .deb dependancy hell
From: Monique Y. Herman (spam_at_bounceswoosh.org)
Date: 01/29/04
- Previous message: Ian Perry: "RE: Mailbox problem... messgae too large"
- In reply to: Richard Hoskins: "Re: .deb dependancy hell"
- Next in thread: Richard Hoskins: "Re: .deb dependancy hell"
- Reply: Richard Hoskins: "Re: .deb dependancy hell"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:36:59 -0700
On 2004-01-29, Richard Hoskins penned:
> Stephen Rueger <stephen.rueger@rechnerpost.org> writes:
>
>> Conclusion: Stop using low level tools if you can't handle them and
>> don't complain about them if you don't understand them. Get yourself
>> a proper package management frontend like dselect or aptitude.
>
> I wasn't complaining.
What part of the phrase "dependency hell" doesn't imply complaint?
-- monique -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Ian Perry: "RE: Mailbox problem... messgae too large"
- In reply to: Richard Hoskins: "Re: .deb dependancy hell"
- Next in thread: Richard Hoskins: "Re: .deb dependancy hell"
- Reply: Richard Hoskins: "Re: .deb dependancy hell"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]