Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others
From: Adam Aube (aaube01_at_baker.edu)
Date: 01/30/04
- Previous message: Roberto Sanchez: "Re: NFS performace on 2.6.1 -> 2.6.1"
- In reply to: Ian Perry: "Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Next in thread: Steve Lamb: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Reply: Steve Lamb: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Reply: Kirk Strauser: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:11:23 -0500
On Thursday 29 January 2004 11:50 pm, Ian Perry wrote:
> I know this question is subjective to personal preferences.... Is
> there an advantage to exim over sendmail or vice versa for ease of
> setup/maintenance etc ? I would be interested in comments from those
> who have used both.
> Is there something better than either of them ?
My personal preference is qmail. Not sure if it's available in the Debian
archive or not, but you can check out www.qmail.org for more info - look
for the links to netqmail.
I also know that many people are happy with Postfix (which is in the
Debian archive). I have no experience with it.
> I have very little experience with either of them, and have found
> nothing in the archives on the subject. I need something extremely
> simple to simply send and receive mail, but not to be an open relay.
qmail, by default, will not relay AT ALL, and I have found it very easy to
install and setup.
Adam
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Roberto Sanchez: "Re: NFS performace on 2.6.1 -> 2.6.1"
- In reply to: Ian Perry: "Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Next in thread: Steve Lamb: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Reply: Steve Lamb: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Reply: Kirk Strauser: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]