Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others
From: Steve Lamb (grey_at_dmiyu.org)
Date: 01/30/04
- Previous message: Tobias Reckhard: "Re: different hard drive size showing"
- In reply to: Ian Perry: "Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Next in thread: Nano Nano: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Reply: Nano Nano: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Reply: Lucas Albers: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:36:22 -0800 To: Debian Users <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Ian Perry wrote:
> I know this question is subjective to personal preferences.... Is there an
> advantage to exim over sendmail or vice versa for ease of setup/maintenance
> etc ? I would be interested in comments from those who have used both.
Sendmail - so difficult to configure the configuration language needs a
macro language to make sense of it.
Exim - so easy to configure that in most cases you can do it with the
comments in the config file.
That's where the comperison ends for me. I've never found a need for
sendmail in the modern 'net populated with Postfix and Exim.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Tobias Reckhard: "Re: different hard drive size showing"
- In reply to: Ian Perry: "Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Next in thread: Nano Nano: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Reply: Nano Nano: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Reply: Lucas Albers: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|