Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others
From: Nano Nano (40119.nospam_at_comcast.net)
Date: 01/30/04
- Previous message: Steve Lamb: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- In reply to: Steve Lamb: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Next in thread: Nano Nano: "postfix [was Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others]"
- Reply: Nano Nano: "postfix [was Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:53:43 -0800 To: Debian Users <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 09:36:22PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> That's where the comperison ends for me. I've never found a need for
> sendmail in the modern 'net populated with Postfix and Exim.
Well, i just bit the bullet: I installed postfix-tls on Sid.
Up till now I just answer the questions during Woody install for
"smarthost" system. Postfix-tls asked me the same questions and I
answered them the same way (I think). It also removed exim.
Configuration: Internet with smarthost
Append .domain? No
Smtp relay host? My ISPs smtp server
Final destination domains? <default choices>
--->Force synchronous updates on mail queue? Yes
Is that it? Just drop in and go? I did "force syncronous updates" so I
wouldn't ever lose mail.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Steve Lamb: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- In reply to: Steve Lamb: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Next in thread: Nano Nano: "postfix [was Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others]"
- Reply: Nano Nano: "postfix [was Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]