Virus bot bounces (Was: ALCATEL POLICY : your message has been refused)
From: s. keeling (keeling_at_spots.ab.ca)
Date: 01/30/04
- Previous message: Kirk Strauser: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- In reply to: support_at_alcanet.com.au: "ALCATEL POLICY : your message has been refused"
- Next in thread: Mark M: "Re: Virus bot bounces (Was: ALCATEL POLICY : your message has been refused)"
- Reply: Mark M: "Re: Virus bot bounces (Was: ALCATEL POLICY : your message has been refused)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 23:10:17 -0700 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Incoming from support@alcanet.com.au:
> ******************** e-mail Manager Notification **********************
>
> As a security precaution this mail was blocked and discarded since it
Grrr. Can we pass a law that says all these virus checker programs
have to insert an X-Virus-Bot: header into their bounces?!? How do we
change the RFC?
-- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*) http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling - - -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Kirk Strauser: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- In reply to: support_at_alcanet.com.au: "ALCATEL POLICY : your message has been refused"
- Next in thread: Mark M: "Re: Virus bot bounces (Was: ALCATEL POLICY : your message has been refused)"
- Reply: Mark M: "Re: Virus bot bounces (Was: ALCATEL POLICY : your message has been refused)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]