Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others
From: Lucas Albers (albersl_at_cs.montana.edu)
Date: 01/30/04
- Previous message: Lucas Albers: "Re: Debian list = spam and virus repeater/multiplexer"
- In reply to: Steve Lamb: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Next in thread: Steve Lamb: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Reply: Steve Lamb: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 23:48:11 -0700 (MST) To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Steve Lamb said:
> Sendmail - so difficult to configure the configuration language needs
> a
> macro language to make sense of it.
>
> Exim - so easy to configure that in most cases you can do it with the
> comments in the config file.
>
> That's where the comperison ends for me. I've never found a need for
> sendmail in the modern 'net populated with Postfix and Exim.
Sendmail does a lot, the milter interface allows you to
massage/filter/virus scan email, and reject at the 5xx level.
With sendmail+mimedefang I can do some amazing things, set some address to
send only, filter by any combination of sender,recipient,relay,message
name,size,spam score,extension type, number of relay attempts,etc.
I use postfix on all my server's clients except for my primary and
secondary mail servers.
-- --Luke CS Sysadmin, Montana State University-Bozeman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Lucas Albers: "Re: Debian list = spam and virus repeater/multiplexer"
- In reply to: Steve Lamb: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Next in thread: Steve Lamb: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Reply: Steve Lamb: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]