Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others

From: Dan Lawrence (dan_at_cutthatout.com)
Date: 01/30/04

  • Next message: Jamin W. Collins: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
    Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:36:55 -0600
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    
    

    On 29 Jan 2004, "Ian Perry" <iperry@inertia.com.au> wrote in
    linux.debian.user:
    > I know this question is subjective to personal preferences.... Is
    > there an advantage to exim over sendmail or vice versa for ease of
    > setup/maintenance etc ? I would be interested in comments from
    > those who have used both.
    >
    > Is there something better than either of them ?

    I've used sendmail when I was new with a Redhat install. I switched
    to postfix largely because it was essentially a "drop in"
    replacement for sendmail (only half true, you still need to learn
    the config files, but there is good documentation in the config
    files).

    When I recently switched to debian, I stuck with postfix. One of my
    favorite things about debian is how easy it was to replace exim (the
    distribution default mailer) with postfix:
      apt-get install postfix exim-
    the postfix installer asks you a few questions and its up and
    running.

    If you are using woody, I would suggest you go with a newer version.
     2.18-1 is in testing and compiles pretty easily.

    The two things I like the most about postfix is it's still seeing
    new features and it is very robust. There are developer snapshots
    (which the author uses every day in his production environment) if
    you want to try out the newer features (like greylisting and
    automatic connection dynamic limiting which they are calling anvil.

    With the recent outbreak of MyDoom, I've been hearing very good
    reports about postfix dealing with very heavy loads. One person in
    the postfix mailing list reported receiving (and rejecting) more
    then 2 million MyDoom payloads in 1 day. That's more performance
    then I will ever need here at home :)

    -Dan

    -- 
    dan@cutthatout.com    http://www.cutthatout.com  Seattle, WA  USA
    I can't spell and I don't care.
    Fight back against worms and blackhats - http://www.mynetwatchman.com
    SPAM bait: bighole2003@cutthatout.com uce@ftc.gov report@fraud.org
    abuse@localhost postmaster@localhost admin@localhost
    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: Jamin W. Collins: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Email Servers
      ... On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 15:08, Paul Dubinsky wrote: ... >> But I still have no clue what I installed I gather sendmail. ... > Sendmail and/or Postfix is installed. ... > install if you're not careful. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Mail Services
      ... > package from the Fedora install. ... I like Sendmail, others Postfix or Exim. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: /etc/alternatives
      ... Its most common use is to switch between sendmail and postfix, ... many programs look for a 'sendmail' binary when they want to, well, send mail. ... postfix you would normally have to uninstall sendmail and then install ... is done using a series of 'slave' links which are automtically switched over ...
      (RedHat)
    • RE: /etc/alternatives
      ... you know how I can get Sun's java from their JDK working again? ... Its most common use is to switch between sendmail and postfix, ... postfix you would normally have to uninstall sendmail and then install ...
      (RedHat)
    • Re: Why did Debian bundle exim instead of postfix or sendmail as the Default MTA?
      ... >> Sendmail as the default MTA? ... > * Exim is easy to configure ... > * Postfix' license may be too restrictive for some ... the Debian Project and University of Cambridge AFAIK - but it's well ...
      (Debian-User)