Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others
From: Katipo (katipo_at_weavers-web.org)
Date: 01/30/04
- Previous message: Nano Nano: "Re: postfix [was Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others]"
- In reply to: Ian Perry: "RE: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Next in thread: Nano Nano: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Reply: Nano Nano: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Reply: Steve Lamb: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Reply: Thorsten Haude: "MDA (was: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:00:49 +0800 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:13:58 +1100
"Ian Perry" <iperry@inertia.com.au> wrote:
>
> Over the weekend, I will 'play'.
>
> I just came across this comparison of the four which I found interesting.
> http://shearer.org/en/writing/mtacomparison.html
>
Procmail is definitely worth looking at. Also
clamav, spamassassin, amavis, spamc.
Regards,
David.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Nano Nano: "Re: postfix [was Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others]"
- In reply to: Ian Perry: "RE: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Next in thread: Nano Nano: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Reply: Nano Nano: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Reply: Steve Lamb: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Reply: Thorsten Haude: "MDA (was: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|