Re: postfix [was Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others]
From: Thorsten Haude (debian_at_thorstenhau.de)
Date: 01/30/04
- Previous message: Nano Nano: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- In reply to: Nano Nano: "Re: postfix [was Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others]"
- Next in thread: Nano Nano: "Re: postfix [was Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others]"
- Reply: Nano Nano: "Re: postfix [was Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:02:25 +0100 To: Debian Users <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Moin,
* Nano Nano wrote (2004-01-30 08:52):
>On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 08:19:36AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
>> What's in the log for this message?
>
>from /var/log/mail.log:
>
>Jan 29 23:42:00 desk postfix/smtp[4117]: 8AEF514756:
>to=<40119.nospam@comcast.net>, relay=smtp.comcast.net[204.127.198.27],
>delay=0, status=bounced (host smtp.comcast.net[204.127.198.27] said: 550
>[PERMFAIL] comcast.net requires valid sender (in reply to RCPT TO
>command))
(Oops.)
Don't be so frugal, what are the other entries for this mail?
Thorsten
--
Every person shall have the right freely to inform himself
without hindrance from generally accessible sources.
- German Grundgesetz, Article 5, Sec. 1
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Nano Nano: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- In reply to: Nano Nano: "Re: postfix [was Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others]"
- Next in thread: Nano Nano: "Re: postfix [was Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others]"
- Reply: Nano Nano: "Re: postfix [was Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|