Re: Virus bot bounces (Was: ALCATEL POLICY : your message has been refused)

From: Mark M (mark_at_menem.mine.nu)
Date: 01/30/04

  • Next message: registrar_at_namascusa.com: "Re: test" 
    Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:46:11 +0100
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org

    s. keeling schreef:
    > Incoming from support@alcanet.com.au:
    >
    >>******************** e-mail Manager Notification **********************
    >>
    >>As a security precaution this mail was blocked and discarded since it
    >
    >
    > Grrr. Can we pass a law that says all these virus checker programs
    > have to insert an X-Virus-Bot: header into their bounces?!? How do we
    > change the RFC?
    >
    >

    Perfect! Excellent Idea! Soem do that BTW, but no standard has been setup.

    Where do we start?

    Mark 

    -- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
  • Next message: registrar_at_namascusa.com: "Re: test"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Virus bot bounces
      ... |>Incoming from support@alcanet.com.au: ... |>>As a security precaution this mail was blocked and discarded since it ... |>change the RFC? ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Virus bot bounces (Was: ALCATEL POLICY : your message has been refused)
      ... > As a security precaution this mail was blocked and discarded since it ... Grrr. ... Can we pass a law that says all these virus checker programs ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Email Monitoring
      ... I can get the incoming easily. ... > options using MIMEDefang and milter-bcc. ... be exercised at the discretion of management. ... If you don't do these things and your state has some law prohibiting ...
      (Fedora)