Re: MDA (was: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others)
From: Monique Y. Herman (spam_at_bounceswoosh.org)
Date: 01/30/04
- Previous message: Hugo Vanwoerkom: "Re: Esta"
- In reply to: Thorsten Haude: "MDA (was: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others)"
- Next in thread: Katipo: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:03:36 -0700
On 2004-01-30, Thorsten Haude penned:
>
> --ryJZkp9/svQ58syV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding:
> quoted-printable
>
> Moin,
>
> * Katipo wrote (2004-01-30 09:00):
>>Procmail is definitely worth looking at.
>
> If you like Sendmail, you'll *love* Procmail. For other people, try a
> software which looks less like line noise.
>
> I started using Maildrop for real a couple of weeks ago and I am quite
> impressed. Nothing from my previous Mail::Audit script it couldn't
> handle with little effort.
>
>
I still use procmail for some stuff, but for most of my filtering rules,
I use tmda. Its filter rules are extremely easy to read *and* write.
The only caveat is that tmda acts as a challenge/response system by
default, so if you don't want that functionality, you need to set
ACTION_INCOMING to something other than the default in ~/.tmda/config.
-- monique -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Hugo Vanwoerkom: "Re: Esta"
- In reply to: Thorsten Haude: "MDA (was: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others)"
- Next in thread: Katipo: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]