Exim vs Procmail (was: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others)
From: Vincent Lefevre (vincent_at_vinc17.org)
Date: 01/31/04
- Previous message: PalmOS Games: "Automatic response to your mail"
- In reply to: Miquel van Smoorenburg: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Next in thread: Adam Aube: "Re: Exim vs Procmail (was: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others)"
- Reply: Adam Aube: "Re: Exim vs Procmail (was: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others)"
- Reply: Thorsten Haude: "Re: Exim vs Procmail (was: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others)"
- Reply: Miquel van Smoorenburg: "Re: Exim vs Procmail (was: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others)"
- Reply: Pigeon: "Re: Exim vs Procmail (was: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 01:09:21 +0100 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On 2004-01-30 18:34:17 +0000, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> See http://www.exim.org/ . Click on "Documentation and FAQs".
Thanks. The FAQ says to use procmail. :)
> The same documentation is available as a text file in
> /usr/share/doc/exim (spec.txt and filter.txt).
There are several things I don't like:
* Exim uses the .forward file which is also used by other MTAs.
This may lead to clashes and lost mail if something changes at
the system level (e.g. another MTA is used). A bit dangerous.
A .eximrc would have been a better idea.
* The behavior may depend on some choices done by the sysadmin
(or the package maintener).
* An error is treated as a delivery failure. This is bad as the
message would be lost and the sender probably annoyed by a
mailer-daemon. A non-zero exit status that propagates (like
with procmail) would be the solution. Note: I get my remote
mail by POP3 with getmail.
* A result of a pipe can't be retrieved (and that's why the FAQ
recommends to use procmail for such things).
Another point is that exim isn't the only MTA. Whereas the user can
have procmail filters on all his accounts, this isn't necessarily
possible with exim filters.
However, procmail isn't perfect. The main problem is that it isn't
very powerful and may need other tools (mainly formail, but also
perl for the most complicated filters). A 100% perl-based solution
(with primitives for MIME decoding) would probably better for me.
-- Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> - 100% validated (X)HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yellow Pig 17, Championnat International des Jeux Mathématiques et Logiques, TETRHEX, etc. Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: PalmOS Games: "Automatic response to your mail"
- In reply to: Miquel van Smoorenburg: "Re: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others"
- Next in thread: Adam Aube: "Re: Exim vs Procmail (was: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others)"
- Reply: Adam Aube: "Re: Exim vs Procmail (was: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others)"
- Reply: Thorsten Haude: "Re: Exim vs Procmail (was: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others)"
- Reply: Miquel van Smoorenburg: "Re: Exim vs Procmail (was: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others)"
- Reply: Pigeon: "Re: Exim vs Procmail (was: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|