Re: Exim vs Procmail (was: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others)
From: Miquel van Smoorenburg (miquels_at_cistron.nl)
Date: 01/31/04
- Previous message: Nicos Gollan: "Re: choice of languages for debian system tool?"
- In reply to: Vincent Lefevre: "Exim vs Procmail (was: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others)"
- Next in thread: Pigeon: "Re: Exim vs Procmail (was: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 14:13:04 +0000 (UTC) To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In article <20040131000921.GM13349@ay.vinc17.org>,
Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.org> wrote:
>On 2004-01-30 18:34:17 +0000, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>> See http://www.exim.org/ . Click on "Documentation and FAQs".
>
>There are several things I don't like:
You're probably right on most of those, exim filtering isn't
the end-all be-all of mail filtering, but:
>* Exim uses the .forward file which is also used by other MTAs.
> This may lead to clashes and lost mail if something changes at
> the system level (e.g. another MTA is used). A bit dangerous.
> A .eximrc would have been a better idea.
This is configurable.
Mike.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Nicos Gollan: "Re: choice of languages for debian system tool?"
- In reply to: Vincent Lefevre: "Exim vs Procmail (was: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others)"
- Next in thread: Pigeon: "Re: Exim vs Procmail (was: Sendmail vs Exim vs Others)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]