Re: Debain on the rise ! - However ....

From: Micha Feigin (micha_at_luna.mooo.com)
Date: 02/05/04

  • Next message: Brad Cramer: "Tekram dc-390u2w and kernel 2.6.0"
    Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 17:58:04 +0200
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    
    

    On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 07:13:01PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
    > CCing this just in case WB has left the building...
    >
    > On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 11:32:48AM -0700, W. B. Maguire II wrote:
    > > And what about discretization in other areas? I asked a question about the
    > > Debian install (3.0 r1) not recognizing my HDDs connected to a Rocket-133
    > > PCI-IDE card (a few days ago---titled "New Debian install + Rocket133 = no
    > > HDDs! (Please help...").
    >
    > Adding pleas for help ("Please help" "HELP!!" or similar) on *any*
    > high traffic mailing list usually causes everybody else's brain to
    > automatically s/$PLEA/I'm a noob without a clue and entitlement
    > issues, delete me and move on/ .
    >
    > You might have greater success after giving ESR's howto a readthrough.
    >
    > http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
    >
    > > The end result? The end result is unfortunate for Debian. I really *did*
    > > want to try Debian, but with the only response I got to my
    > > hour-long-researching-post being "compile your own kernel", that pretty
    > > much shut this new-comer down!
    >
    > If I had seen it, I would have asked if you had read the Installation
    > Manual (http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/install), or
    > suggest you try Knoppix.
    >
    > > In the few days that I have been on this list, I can
    > > say that I have seen many, many requests for help go unanswered.
    >
    > It's not our fault that people still haven't gotten the hang of
    > effectively communicating in written form almost 40 years after the
    > creation of email, and several millennia after the advent of written
    > language. We exist because we don't want to cater to the Great Unwashed.
    >
    > > Maybe I'll be able to give Debian a try at some point in the future, but at
    > > this point, it feels almost unsupported to me. I'm not saying that there's
    > > no help here, I'm just saying that the volume is *crushing*, and that it
    > > seems that many of the requests for help are being lost in the volume!
    >
    > Is your mail reader threaded? You'd notice that the vast majority of
    > messages are parts of existing threads. Most threads get response.
    > If you don't get a response, you're doing something that's causing
    > people to avoid that thread (bad subject, not enough info, looks even
    > remotely like another AOL idiot thinking we care about their "printer
    > icon", etc).
    >
    > > It sounds to me that you imply that anyone who doesn't have a good mail
    > > client just shouldn't bother with this list.
    >
    > Well, you're on the right track. Anybody who doesn't have a good mail
    > client shouldn't bitch that they get burned by volume. Especially on
    > this list. Just popping open tin real quick and searching my news
    > server, I see these newsgroups *all* mirror this list (post by sending
    > directly to the list):
    >
    > apana.lists.os.linux.debian.user
    > jlug.ml.debian.users
    > linux.debian.user
    >
    > I also know of (but don't seem to carry)...gmane.debian.user
    >
    > There's also a digest version.
    >
    > Anybody who has a bad mail client has no business using email. 8:o)
    >
    > > I, myself, haven't had the time to migrate to Mutt on my RH9 Linux
    > > box, so I'm temporarily putting-up with Eudora on Win98 (even though
    > > I *hate* it and Windows!).
    >

    What about kmail or evolution (probably mozilla variations but I don't
    know them)? Very similar to eudora in feel, easy to set up (not as
    strong as mutt IMHO though). They can thread, filter, separate into
    mailboxes using rules/origin etc. I think they can even use spamassassin
    and friends.
    This list becomes much more menagable with threading.

    > Fastest, easiest way to solve that problem: Delete windows now and
    > don't go back. You don't learn to swim by standing in the wading
    > pool, after all. Most guys I know, myself included, learned to swim
    > by being pushed off the pier at a Scout camp in my early teen years.
    > I'm a pretty strong swimmer now.
    >
    > It worked again for me in 1997 when I switched to Debian. You think
    > Debian's a bit off-setting to newbies now, you should go back five
    > years. Before apt!
    >
    > > Fine, maybe you and your *good* e-mail client can handle the volume
    > > on this list, but what about me and my *Windoze-average/crappy*
    > > e-mail client?
    >
    > You make it sound like we should be spending our time catering to the
    > weakest link (bad software) instead of working towards the goal of
    > getting the people who are ready for it over to a better alternative.
    >
    > > _________ Maguire@AnalyticInvestments.com ________ |**===
    > > / |**===
    > > ( W. B. Maguire II, Ph.D. Tel: 303.772.1615 |=====
    > > | Chief Executive Manager FAX: 303.651.6389 9||
    > > | Analytic Investments LLC _ |
    > > | 700 Ken Pratt Blvd STE204 PMB166 ( ) The ASCII ribbon |
    > > ( Longmont CO 80501-6455 X campaign against )
    > > \__________________________________ / \ _ HTML e-mail __/
    >
    > As bad as HTML email is, arguably, warlording is worse. There's a
    > chance HTML email has content, massive sigblocks are content-free.
    >
    > http://ursine.ca/jargon/html/W/warlording.html
    >
    > --
    > .''`. Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
    > : :' :
    > `. `'` proud Debian admin and user
    > `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system
    >
    >
    > --
    > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
    > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    >

    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: Brad Cramer: "Tekram dc-390u2w and kernel 2.6.0"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Debain on the rise ! - However ....
      ... Most threads get response. ... client shouldn't bitch that they get burned by volume. ... It worked again for me in 1997 when I switched to Debian. ... As bad as HTML email is, arguably, warlording is worse. ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Client/Service relationships & Flow of Requirements.
      ... the client calls "foo" when it wants "bar" to return a particular value. ... The following is designed to compel Prey objects to do something: ... predator < 100 yards from prey ... It is the expectation of the response that makes the runFrom name immediately suspect in an OO context. ...
      (comp.object)
    • Re: [Full-disclosure] [Professional IT Security Providers -Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F )
      ... the review a second time and incorporate some of your suggestions. ... to do what the client will pay him for. ... exactly a vulnerability assessment is... ... Your response to question 3: ...
      (Full-Disclosure)
    • Re: Message-based vs. method-based interaction [was: Re: LSP and subtype]
      ... That means the sender implementation does not to know about the response, much less depend in any way on what the responder does, so LSP becomes academic. ... Separation of message and method allows one to design both the client and the service independently. ... Then the entire LSP issue comes down to determining where in the subclassing tree the client should access. ... To do that one needs the OOA/D mindset that clients generate messages, ...
      (comp.object)
    • Re: Socket write behaviour is inconsistent?
      ... copy 1 byte to buffer, copy many bytes to buffer, copy one byte to ... Then why did you write "the client throws an error"? ... remote endpoint for your connection. ... When the response is sent using the first chunk of code, ...
      (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)