Re: Rejecting viruses the Right Way[tm]

From: Kjetil Kjernsmo (kjetil_at_kjernsmo.net)
Date: 02/09/04

  • Next message: Kjetil Kjernsmo: "Re: Two Apache instances; IPTables to redirect ports"
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 19:31:38 +0100
    
    

    On Monday 09 February 2004 17:52, Steve Lamb wrote:
    > Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
    > > If a message is either rejected (during the SMTP dialog) or bounced
    > > (after accepting and queueing the message) then the same innocent
    > > third party receives some junk mail.[1] The difference is only in
    > > which server is sending the bounce message.
    >
    > The presumption being, of course, that the other side is a real
    > MTA and not the virus/worm itself. Rejecting is acceptable as the
    > onus is on the other side on what to do. You're not generating the
    > bounce. If it is a virus/worm then it isn't likely to generate a
    > bounce. If it is an MTA then they had best get their act together
    > and not propigate viruses.

    Right. This is, I think, the idea behind rejecting the message (both
    viruses and spam), is that it is not you who are generating the bounce,
    so unless the virus is programmed to deal with the rejection, nobody
    will get the bounce.

    Same with spam, it is the actual spammer who will get the rejection. He
    may generate a bounce to whoever he has forged into the MAIL FROM:, but
    he has no reason to do so, has he? Also, he has to clean his lists now
    and then, otherwise, he would spam mostly dead addresses. So, one would
    think that he would use the rejection to clean the lists, but I can't
    see that happening.

    So, basically, if gluck had rejected the message on RCPT TO: rather than
    send it over to master, a bounce message would presumably not have
    been generated by (in this case) 213.222.144.148.

    But it raises the question, what if viruses are doing something to deal
    with a rejection, and does it with malice, could they use it to do bad
    things?

    Best,

    Kjetil

    -- 
    Kjetil Kjernsmo
    Astrophysicist/IT Consultant/Skeptic/Ski-orienteer/Orienteer/Mountaineer
    kjetil@kjernsmo.net  webmaster@skepsis.no  editor@learn-orienteering.org
    Homepage: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/        OpenPGP KeyID: 6A6A0BBC
    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: Kjetil Kjernsmo: "Re: Two Apache instances; IPTables to redirect ports"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: ubuntu-users Digest, Vol 44, Issue 168
      ... They run spam ... They should never bounce what they think is spam. ... the server would have accepted the message and then sent back the NDR ... the rejection, but no NDR is sent directly... ...
      (Ubuntu)
    • Re: ubuntu-users Digest, Vol 44, Issue 168
      ... They run spam filtering ... They should never bounce what they think is spam. ... They refuse the connection on the SMTP server before the message is accepted, then the sender's server is sending back the NDR. ... If you reject the message at the connection, you still have to give a reason for the rejection, but no NDR is sent directly... ...
      (Ubuntu)
    • Re: mailing list
      ... >of the last bounce message we've received from all addresses. ... All they can tell me is that the "standard spam filter" ... To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: How to configure Sendmail not sending reject message to spamming machine
      ... Just wonder how one can set up Sendmail not to send bounce or reject ... In the default configuration Sendmail rejects mail, ... A rejection has no downside - the connecting host is responsible for ... error code to the connecting host. ...
      (comp.mail.sendmail)
    • Re: Read receipts in Mail app
      ... If the bounce message gets filtered as spam ... If the recipient system is an "accept and then bounce" system such ... E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM ... filter. ...
      (comp.sys.mac.apps)