Re: Linux Compatibility Issue

From: Adam Aube (aaube01_at_baker.edu)
Date: 02/14/04

  • Next message: Danny: "Re: How to install Debian with Promise FastTrak 376 chip onboard?"
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 11:32:46 -0500
    
    

    On Saturday 14 February 2004 11:58 am, Abdul Latip wrote:
    > Once in a while, users are asking me about the compatibilty problem of
    > Linux. They reasoning that M$Office can be installed anywhere like
    > Win98, WinME, WinNT, et. al.

    Actually, many Windows app CDs come with multiple installers for the
    various versions of Windows. The installer just detects the version of
    Windows and runs the correct installer - it's transparent to the user.

    The same thing could be done on Linux, but there's not much point. Most
    CDs come from the distro itself (and are therefore packaged correctly),
    and download sites usually carry packages for most of the distros (if the
    distro doesn't already provide it).

    > Whereas it is hard to install a RedHat package into Debian, and so on.

    Mostly because a RedHat and Debian package that provides the same thing
    may have a slightly different name, version number, or feature set.
    Factor in the dependencies a package has, and you can see where the
    difficulty comes in.

    > It seems they are not so backward compatible?

    Mostly because of changes in dependencies (including glibc). However, many
    Linux distributions (including Debian) backport newer versions of
    packages, so backwards compatibility issues don't come up that often.

    Even if you have to upgrade an application, the upgrade usually costs
    nothing but time, which is more than I can say for most Windows apps.

    Adam

    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: Danny: "Re: How to install Debian with Promise FastTrak 376 chip onboard?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: redhat vs debian
      ... > installer is designed to make the OS and optional packages very easy to ... It is very much a version of linux with the potential to ... the installer is a nice one. ... I just installed both Fedora and Debian Woody last weekend (all this RHE ...
      (linux.redhat)
    • Re: [SLE] How to allow ftp and telnet
      ... insofar as it comprises a great many packages totaling hundreds of ... I downloaded the setup.exe from cygwin. ... Run the installer, step through the wizard-style interface and a few ... To a first approximation the Cygwin "experience" is much like the Linux ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: Fedora 7 : Fresh Install, defaulted to Runlevel 3
      ... The problems for me seemed to be that the optional packages did not que up properly. ... The installer gave me the option to pick a host of games but not even the kde or gnome games were installed. ... The reason that I even used the text installer was because the GUI installer could not open rpms at certain points in the installation. ... the tools for Linux post-install launched SMART which revealed 3 bad sectors on the drive. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Fedora 7 : Fresh Install, defaulted to Runlevel 3
      ... The problems for me seemed to be that the optional packages did not que ... There seem to not be care to the text installer. ... for text as with the GUI, ... the tools for Linux post-install launched SMART which revealed ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Best Linux version to port from OpenServer 5.0.5/6
      ... > We are embarking on a project to port from OpenServer 5.0.5/6, to Linux. ... something that doesn install aload of crap you don't need... ... The package management allows easy installs of packages, ... Debian will never die!,See the social ...
      (comp.unix.sco.misc)