Re: Rejecting viruses the Right Way[tm]
From: Paul Johnson (baloo_at_ursine.ca)
Date: 02/14/04
- Previous message: 小咪: "把你的寄过来"
- In reply to: Karsten M. Self: "Re: Rejecting viruses the Right Way[tm]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 13:37:32 -0800 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 10:18:32PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > If a message is either rejected (during the SMTP dialog) or bounced
> > (after accepting and queueing the message) then the same innocent
> > third party receives some junk mail.[1] The difference is only in
> > which server is sending the bounce message.
>
> Not so.
>
> Few viral SMTP servers will generate and forward a bounce.
>
> SMTP servers holding an open connection with the originating MUA (or the
> virus itself) will pass the reject message to the originating client.
>
> Only misconfigured smarthosts will generate a spurious bounce.
Which is what I was counting on, more or less, when I came up with the
exim/clamav sollution.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
: :' :
`. `'` proud Debian admin and user
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFALpUcUzgNqloQMwcRAngAAJ40PGbTuX/re15mqwVJMfgSbNtq9wCfepJP
b/K749RgvRIboirdrDLXDYY=
=oZJd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: 小咪: "把你的寄过来"
- In reply to: Karsten M. Self: "Re: Rejecting viruses the Right Way[tm]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|