Re: Debian on 640KB or RAM?
From: Pigeon (jah.pigeon_at_ukonline.co.uk)
Date: 02/15/04
- Previous message: Jan Minar: "Re: Quasi-(un)deletion question"
- In reply to: Micha Feigin: "Re: Debian on 640KB or RAM?"
- Next in thread: John Hasler: "Re: Debian on 640KB or RAM?"
- Reply: John Hasler: "Re: Debian on 640KB or RAM?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 16:14:45 +0000 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 06:40:06AM +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 09:48:58PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> > Mike writes:
> > > I don't think the 80286 has a memory management unit
> >
> > It does, but the architecture is different. A 286 won't run Linux.
>
> Are you sure? I thought that the mmu was introduced only in the 386. I
> think I still used direct memory access using far pointers to write the
> video ram and such on a 286.
I think the 286 extended the concept of far pointers somehow to extend
the addressing range to 16 megs and make it a bit more like a proper
MMU, but you were still limited to 64k blocks.
-- Pigeon Be kind to pigeons Get my GPG key here: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x21C61F7F
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Jan Minar: "Re: Quasi-(un)deletion question"
- In reply to: Micha Feigin: "Re: Debian on 640KB or RAM?"
- Next in thread: John Hasler: "Re: Debian on 640KB or RAM?"
- Reply: John Hasler: "Re: Debian on 640KB or RAM?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|