Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird
From: Michael Johnson (mjohnson_at_pitsco.com)
Date: 02/27/04
- Previous message: Rob Weir: "Re: OT: google or debian-user?"
- In reply to: Jan Schulz: "Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird"
- Next in thread: Peter A. Cole: "Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird"
- Reply: Peter A. Cole: "Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 08:26:09 -0600
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:58:50 +0100, Jan Schulz
<muelleimer@usenet.katzien.de> wrote:
> * Peter A. Cole <peteracole@bigpond.com> wrote:
>> Just wondering if anyone can suggest a lighter weight alternative to
>> Mozilla
>> Firebird?
>> I'm running Sarge on an old P200MMX with 160MB RAM, but Firebird still
>> chews
>> up a little too much memory.
>
> Opera.
>
Just keep in mind that Opera grabs idle memory for use in caching. It
readily gives it up when other applications need it, though. Opera has a
.deb on their download site.
Michael
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Rob Weir: "Re: OT: google or debian-user?"
- In reply to: Jan Schulz: "Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird"
- Next in thread: Peter A. Cole: "Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird"
- Reply: Peter A. Cole: "Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|