Re: changing to debian from slackware

From: Lucas Albers (albersl_at_cs.montana.edu)
Date: 02/29/04

  • Next message: Oliver Fuchs: "tar cvfz test.tar.gz / gives error while untaring"
    Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 12:41:21 -0700 (MST)
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    
    

    Joel Kaasinen said:
    > Hi,
    >
    > I have an old dual 133mhz pentium server (64mb ram, ~8Gb scsi harddisk)
    > with
    > slackware 9.1 installed.
    <debian advantages snipped>

    >So now I'm seriously thinking about switching to debian.
    >
    > Any tips (I want to keep my config the same and avoid reconffin')?
    > Differences between debian and slack?
    > Comments?
    I'v seen numerous slack users switch to debian.
    You could install debootstrap on the system and then do a debian chroot
    install. Google about it.

    Install debian on another system first, I use bonzai linux debian
    installer for easier installation. It just uses the 2.4.20 kernel with
    auto-detection of hardware enabled. Still allows me to use a stable
    system.
    Just determine the list of services you want to convert and then copy conf
    files to your new debian install.
    You need to determine what services are used on the system, eg,
    mail server webserver, etc.
    This sort of change is work, no way around it.
    Don't go to the 2.6 kernel yet, you would have to be smoking crack to go
    to a new kernel until it hits the 2.6.10 release for production systems.
    Just my conservative opinion.
    Only do upgrades or switch os's if you have a compelling reason, even a
    security fix is not compelling, if you have no local users.
    Stability is the single most important quality.
    With that said, it is _much_ easier to admin debian boxes than redhat boxes.
    Easier to setup a rh box with hardware/raid detection.
    Much easier to install/remove configure packages resolve dependencies on
    debian. No more dependency hell. Packages are also (imo) much more stable
    and tested.

    I still have systems running redhat 7.2 with the 2.4.9 kernel that are
    doing looong running computational jobs. It works and is not remotelly
    exploitable, so I keep using it.
    Part of the debian philosophy (imo) applied to general linux servers.
    If it works, don't touch it.

    -- 
    --Luke CS Sysadmin, Montana State University-Bozeman
    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: Oliver Fuchs: "tar cvfz test.tar.gz / gives error while untaring"

    Relevant Pages

    • unsubscribe
      ... > Subject: debian newbie... ... If I need to recompile the kernel, ... Also, what other additional packages, ... >> The package you're trying to install presumably ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Debain on the rise ! - However ....
      ... > *Debian* newbie doesn't mean that I'm a complete idiot, ... > I tried *all* the installs, starting with the 2.4 kernel). ... I don't know yet whether I can get the Gentoo install ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: kernel 2.4 -> 2.6 upgrading procedure
      ... > Debian a couple days ago using a DVD from the magazine Linux Format. ... In the future when you install Debian it is highly recommended to ... install using the linux 2.6 kernel instead of the 2.4 kernel. ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: How to know correct hardware options for compiling 2.4.23 kernel
      ... Debian installed pretty well without a hitch. ... I'm now trying to compile the newest and greatest kernel available ... I have a version of Knoppix that works with the laptop (though the last ... >before trying to install on a box. ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Debain on the rise ! - However ....
      ... Just because I'm a *Debian* newbie ... Debian install not recognizing my HDDs connected to a Rocket-133 ... starting with the 2.4 kernel). ... I'm probably going to be using Gentoo ...
      (Debian-User)