Re: FYI: Branden's Response to DPL Platform Question
From: Colin Watson (cjwatson_at_debian.org)
Date: 02/29/04
- Previous message: Monique Y. Herman: "Re: Distributed Jukeboxes for LAN"
- In reply to: s. keeling: "Re: FYI: Branden's Response to DPL Platform Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:07:52 +0000 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 02:11:27PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Joel Konkle-Parker:
> > challenges they've had to face. The fact that approximately 6% of our
> > archive fails to meet bare minimum expectations leads me to believe that
> > we may want to inaugurate a special process for orphaning such packages.
>
> 'Sounds to me like a job for debian-mentoring@lists.debian.org
>
> That might be a great way to draw in potential maintainers (hey, I'd
> read it!), and with %96 good vs. %6 bad, the numbers are promising.
More -qa, really, although a bit of both. Working on such broken
packages is most certainly an activity that does happen at the moment,
but could sometimes do with better organization.
-- Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Monique Y. Herman: "Re: Distributed Jukeboxes for LAN"
- In reply to: s. keeling: "Re: FYI: Branden's Response to DPL Platform Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]